Education Support Access Recertification Study

Protocol status

The reviewable education signal is the source, advisor, timestamp, exception, and completion evidence for whether current access matches the approved student-support role and whether removals are documented.

This page describes a review design and its proposed controls. It does not report an executed sample, measured outcomes, or evidence that the controls improved performance.

Review protocol

Planned review sequence

1. Define the eligible enrollment population from a fixed system export. Record the term, program, query date, filters, and count. Exclude test records and duplicates only under a written rule.
2. List the required fields by enrollment type
3. For each field, name the authoritative source and the acceptable evidence. A value copied from an email is not the same as a value from the student information system. Record the source and the date the value was verified.
4. Review a stratified sample across programs, statuses, and intake channels. Include incomplete and withdrawn records so the result does not describe only the easy cases.
5. Classify missing or conflicting evidence by cause
6. Report the population, the sample, the field-level results, the exclusions, and the limits. Retain the review file and the source versions so another reviewer can reproduce the result.

Operational implications

A required field without a named source cannot be verified.

Intake requirements and later requirements should be separated.

Incomplete records should remain in the population, not disappear from the denominator.

A stratified sample is more useful than a convenience sample.

Missing and conflicting evidence need different remedies.

Completeness does not prove eligibility, funding, or compliance.